Which workflow fits?
DeepSeek Harness (dsh) is an agent harness, not the DeepSeek model API. Its official repository describes a Cordis-based plugin architecture and a Web UI. Compare it with AX Code at the runtime and workflow level.
| Consideration | AX Code | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Primary emphasis | Coding sessions with execution records, comparison and snapshot-based recovery. | A plugin-oriented harness built on Cordis. |
| Entry point | Terminal UI, CLI and local service interfaces. | The documented quickstart launches a local Web UI with dsh web. |
| Evaluation focus | Inspect graph and comparison output; test recovery and candidate verification on a real repository. | Evaluate the plugin lifecycle and the tools, persistence and permissions provided by your chosen configuration. |
What to evaluate with AX Code
AX Code Standard is open source under Apache-2.0. Its terminal workflow supports connected local or cloud models, recorded execution, file-change review and session comparison. Local model performance depends on your hardware and selected model. External services may charge for usage.
AX Code Business is planned. The website’s illustrative speed display is not a benchmark against DeepSeek Harness.
Inspect AX Code’s source and documented capabilities ↗Is this a comparison of DeepSeek models?
No. DeepSeek Harness is the runtime project being compared. Model choice is a separate decision. A useful comparison specifies both the harness configuration and the model used.
Try a representative task
Use separate clean checkouts and the same acceptance tests. For each harness, record which tools ran, what changed, what can be recovered and what customization was needed. Do not infer missing features from a short README.
開始使用 ↗Sources and scope
Written by the AX Code team. This is a workflow comparison, not an independent performance ranking. Check official documentation for current availability, plans and deployment requirements.